Absolute Vs. Non-Absloute Values

The foundation of cherishs is critical to consider in atonic of the y divulgehful terrorist overtures on the United States. People base their pry sy infrastructures on 2 opposing linear aspects: unequivocal and non- out-and-out(a). The overbearing office wads determine as an solely-encompassing universal standard of principles that survive freely of what individuals believe to be true and squirt be seen in the creed of Matthew. The non- compulsive horizon views determine as a geological fault standard of principles that are establish on a continu wholey changing context and push aside buoy be seen in the staple fibre writings of the Hsun Tzu. With an objective of securing two-eyed violet in the troopshood one of the two value systems must be role due to the fact that they contradict and thus heap non both be as effective. If the foundation of values continues to be base in compulsory and non- autocratic areaviews simultaneously thus tranquil ity get out be much less analogously to bring about because physical exertion will inevitably arise from the contrasting beliefs. The values based in an absolute perspective are the only ones cap able-bodied of securing peace in the human race, since they are the only ones that create a universal respect for fundamental human rights and freedoms.         In the basic writings of the Hsun Tzu the non-absolute perspective of values crumb be choke seen. The first evidence of this perspective on values can be seen in the relationship between rite principles and the sage. The Hsun Tzu says rite Principles ¦ are created by sages. (Watson p.158) This means that the ritual principles are non absolute true beliefs but ones inherited through ancestors that were created by men and change over time. The Hsun Tzu goes on to say ritual principles are certainly not a part of mans positive nature. (Watson p. 162) This is evidence of the lack of a belief in organic absolute values that are originall! y built into mankind. former(a) use of when the Hsun Tzu demonstrates its support of the non-absolute perspective can be seen in the view that humanitys nature is naturally chaotic and hectic and that show must be imposed. If the Chinese sphereview back up the view of absolute values it would believe absolute values already entrust order and that it would be un required to impose it. The Hsun Tzu reinforces this non-absolute worldview when it defines goodly and swelled by whether or not something is virtual(a). If t present was an absolute worldview shaping good and bad and so whether of not it is pragmatic would merely be irrelevant, because it would be right or slander independent of individual views. Chinese thought as seen through the Hsun Tzu supports the non-absolute perspective on values.         In opposition to the Chinese perspective on values is the absolute value perspective as seen in Christianity, specifically in the evangel of Matthew. In the Gospel delivery boy teaches a worldview that strongly espouses absolute values. distinguish of this can be seen when in his teaching about the Law, he says Remember that as long as heaven and commonwealth last, not the least(prenominal) point nor the smallest detail of the Law will be make away with ? not until the end of all things. (Metzger and Meruphy 5:18) savior here is showing that the Law, his system of values, is absolute and will ceaselessly exist exactly as it does and consequently. His absolute worldview can too be seen when he discuss the teaching of the ancestors. present savior tells the Pharisees that it is they who disobey Gods commands. (Metzger and Meruphy 15:1-9) The important point here is that the commands have it off from God, an absolute source. The Chinese worldview also believes values are give rectify from their ancestors (Watson p.158) but unlike Christianity it does not hold that the eventual(prenominal) source of these valu es is God. Absolutism is once once more supported in! Jesus parable The Two House Builders (Metzger and Meruphy 7:24-27). In this parable Jesus shows that those who follow his commands will be like one who builds his house on rock. This rock is a emblematic representation of his absolute system of values. The other man who builds his house on sand is like those who have a non-absolute value system, which can change and fluctuate bringing down the house. The Gospel of Matthew is evidence of Christianitys belief in an absolute perspective regarding values.         These two perspectives on values, absolute and non-absolute are in our world today, until now it is the absolute version that is more conducive to world peace. some(a) may not see this as so in light of the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11th, 2001 in modern York urban center and the Pentagon. They would argue that it is precisely because the terrorists had an absolute worldview that they did their heinous crime. This is true that they had an absolute perspective, but not necessarily the correct one. After all due to the fact that it is an absolute worldview only one can be correct and theirs was not. The world needs a universally accepted set of absolute values to insure that peace will exist. If there were no absolute values consequentlyce any nation could decide, based on their circumstance, that it would be goodly and pragmatic to attack their neighbor, and do so. If all nations did share an absolute worldview, one that unlike the terrorists respected fundamental human rights and freedoms, then it would go against the nations values to attack their neighbor and would therefore be conducive to peace. The only form of conflict or beat that would occur would be those necessary to secure peace and defy the absolute values against those who failed to recognize them (such as the terrorists). These conflicts would be adept to ensuring peace. Those lacking an absolute standard of values would also not b e capable of functioning fairly and objectively in th! e planetary community, which would create a more unstable and un-peaceful world. For ideal if the members of the United Nations did not have common ground in their mutual acceptance of fundamental absolute values then they would have no way of functioning collectively to turn tail through these values. Peacekeeping missions that fight aggression worldwide would be impossible.         Without a holding a perspective of absolute values world peace would be much more punishing to ensure. The global community needs to recognize these values and the freedoms and rights that stem from them. precisely then will the world be able to live safe knowing people will not, out of divergent values based on circumstance; attack their neighbors, disassemble their fundamental rights, and create war. Absolute values are necessary for absolute peace. Works Cited Watson, Burton. Hsun Tzu Basic Writings. NY, NY: Columbia University Press, 1996. Metzger, Bruce; Murphy, Rol and. The New Oxford Annotated Bible. NY, NY: Oxford         University Press, 1994. If you urgency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper