Community-based Policing: The Future of Law Enforcement :: Law Enforcement Essays

OUTLINEThesisCommunity-based policing provides hope for the prospective of Law enforcement.I. Introduction to C.B.P.A.The roots of C.B.P.B.So what is community?II.The two elements of C.B.P. law enforcement philosophical system areA. Community partnership.B. Problem solving.III. The reaction of police to change.IV. The future of C.B.P.A. A first step in C.B.P.B. Measuring victory.C. Crime prevention.V. Conclusion.INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNITY-BASED POLICING."In Philadelphia, a pulsating tavern juke box that has ca procedured irate neighbors tolog euchre Police calls in six months, was moved away from a super C wall with theadjoining building. (Author unknown US News) The calls stopped. Though it seemssimple, such a move is at the heart of what we know as Community-based Policing.The movement toward C.B.P. has gained caprice in recent years. As Police andcommunity leaders try for more effective ways to enhance the sense of open preventative and the quality of life in their comm unities. We have accepted C.B.P in wholeness police department after another,and we are ready now to suss out that "C.B.P.provides hope for the future of Law enforcement." We can trace the seed of C.B.P. moxie to Sir Robert Peel, the father of the modern Police system, who said "thePolice is the public and the public are the Police"(Braiden). For differentreasons, the Police lost sight of that formula defining their relationshipwith the public. Modern historians have said that the reform term in government,which started in the 1900s to combat corruption, along with the move toward theprofessional symbol of police work, resulted in the separation of Police andCommunity (Kelling, Moore, pg-5)Reform tendency Policing emerged in the 50s and 60s with rotating shifts andfrequent movement of officers, (to prevent corruption). Random patrolling (areactive police technique) was also detrimental to the link between Police andpublic. The police adoptive a policy of central ized control to ensure compliancewith solidification standards, and to encourage a professional aura of impartiality. Allthese policies along with the use of automobiles, telephones, and othertechnological advances helped distance the Police more. The calls for serviceincreased as urban population and crime awareness increased, making the police close totally reactive. The introduction of computers only encouraged thatfalse idea of " bustling" reactive response and a statistical view toward measuringsuccess in policing(rather than analyzing the local needs of the community.)By the late 70s the communities had become a diverse pool of nationalities,subcultures, and attitudes. People identified themselves as parts of ordergroups and at times the Police was not part of what they called "us. Duringthis time, a crush of new ideas and changes in the sociopolitical and economic