Legal homework 3B Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Legal homework 3B - Essay display show windowTwo is the principle of beneficence. This principle aims to engage in numerous beneficial activities as possible. Beneficence holds that health experts should attempt to benefit the sick. Therefore, in this case, it is presumed that the duty of the nurture is prevent any situation which may fix a threat to Judy, for example, non leaving the bathroom door open. Third is the principle of non-maleficence which entails preventing or minimizing price (Armstrong, 2007). The hospital takes the precaution of checking on Judy aft(prenominal) every fifteen minutes. This is aimed at preventing or minimizing harm to Judy. The nurse was not negligent for unlocking the bathroom door and allowing Judy to shower by herself. This is because she established in her expert discern it was fitting to unlock the bathroom door so that Judy could take a shower. In a 1996 case involving Busta and the Columbus Hospital Corporation, The Montana Supreme Court upheld the decision and order given by the territorial dominion Court of the Eighth Judicial District. The court jury established that the negligence of the Columbus Hospital and that of the patient of led to the injuries and consequent death of the patient. In this case the nurse was deemed not negligent in the events conduct to the death of the patient. ... It was not below the standard of care that the nurse left the bathroom door unlocked when the psychiatrist came to see Judy. The nurse did not see the psychiatrist vacating Judys room. In addition, the psychiatrist did not inform the nurse when leaving the room and had left Judy alone. Therefore, there is no way the nurse could go to check on the patient. Also, the nurse observed the standard of care by checking on the patient after fifteen minutes (Armstrong, 2007). There is a greater duty to this patient from an ethical point of view. This is because nurses capture a responsibility of making sure that patients capable o f self-destructive actions are properly dealt with. In addition, nurses cause the duty of effectively monitoring and assessing patients and conveying these examinations to all individuals involved in the health care preservation team. Nurses also have a duty of telling the truth (Armstrong, 2007). Patients in danger deserve reality as to their exposure and manner of intervention. Health experts with significant opinions regarding suicide should refer the patient elsewhere or reveal them. There are several ethical principles which should be taken into account when caring for much(prenominal) a patient. One is the danger to self. Danger to self may incorporate failure to attend to primary requirements, for example, showering, or suicidal attempts or ideation. In numerous fields, information of intention to engage in suicidal activities needs a health care practitioner to act instantly to stop the suicide. Two is fancy and involuntary treatment. The health expert should make a de cision on whether to hold the patient against his need (Armstrong, 2007). Holding a patient against his desire may be indispensable